Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

City-Region as the Extension of Urban Fabric

Authors
Saeed Dalil
abolfazl meshkini
jafar javan
Abstract
Introduction
City-region qua a system of concepts has a theoretical, empirical and epistemological significance. On the strength of such a capacity, this system is applied to better understand the structures of production of space in different scales (global, international, national, regional and urban).
Materials and Methods
Using Henri Lefebvre’s conception of Urban Fabric, this paper tries to bring about a different reading of the concept of city-region. Not only the concept of city-region per se but also the whole system of this concept (region, neo-regionalism and city-region) is read in light of Lefebvre’s Urban Fabric. On the one side of this reading are subjects and their lived experiences, and on the other are institutions, governmental and administrative bodies. This reading emphasizes the importance of the subject in producing the scale, the gravity of the concept of scale itself and the importance of governance under the condition of neoliberal production of space. In the age of globalization and capitalist production of the city under neoliberal production of space, how does the city have its life and institutional content? The concept of Urban Fabric combines these two elements, and at the same time transcends them. This concept is the mediation between the two extreme limits of city region, i.e. the rural (hinterland) and its urban core. This concept also functions as a kind of perspective or standpoint, which qua the mirror of the relation between urban society and land manifests the mode of production of urban land within the urban institutional structure through its dissolution, which leads to the expression of Urban Fabric.
Discussion and Results
During the recent neoliberal production of space, there happens to emerge forms of city-region through the implosion-explosion of the urban core. Consequently, up to the urban hinterland, the thrown pieces of Urban Fabric are extended here and there. This reading of city-region tries to explain fractures and disintegration of the city and its extension to its surrounding during late capitalism, investigating it from institutional, structural and subjective dimensions. Urban Fabric demonstrates the social condition of the production of urban tissues under globalized circumstances. As a kind of embodiment of subjectivity in post-industrial age, Urban Fabric draws the condition of urban expansion, which as such, displays the state’s position as an entrepreneur and an enterprise. This would lead to the emergence of the condition of production of housing and commodification of space in order to prepare regions to compete with other international city regions. The conceptual hierarchy in this analysis begins with the everyday, spatial practices, which finally reaches its form. In other words, forms, the lived and the rational, are traceable in Lefebvrian Urban Fabric.
Conclusions
Today, Urban Fabric can be proposed for subjects such as uneven development, territorial differentiation and center-periphery polarity. In the age of globalization, whatever that was considered urban or in a way deemed as its features, such as definitive industrial and financial rationality, extends outside the city as if the region becomes a the Urban Fabric of the city. In each stage of urban implosion-explosion, the scale of effect and the extension of Urban Fabric becomes different, since the speed and quality of urbanization is different. If today, there are variety of the concept of city-region, it is because of the different effect it exerts upon social space.
Keywords
urban fabric
City-Region
New Regionalism
Henri Lefebvre
Amin, A. (2003). Post-Fordism: a reader. Blackwell. Boyle, M. (2015). Human Geography: A Concise Introduction. Blackwell. Brenner, N. (1999). Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality, and Geographical Scale in Globalization Studies. Theory and Society, 28(1), 39-78. Brenner, N. (2000). The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 361-378. Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the Newest “Metropolitan Regionalism” in the USA: A Critical Overview. Cities, 19(1), 3-21. Brenner, N. (2004a). Urban Governance and the Production of New State Spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447-488. Brenner, N. (2004b). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford University Press. Buttimer, A. (1971). Society and Milieu in the French Geographic Tradition. Association of American Geographers. Claval, P. (1993). An Introduction to Regional Geography. Blackwell. Cresswell, T. (2013). Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell. Davoudi S. (2008). Conceptions of the city-region: a critical review. Urban Design and Planning, 161 (2), 51-60. Elam, M. (2000). Puzzling out the Post-Fordist Debate: Technology, Markets and Institutions. In: Amin A. (Ed) Post-Fordism: A Reader. Blackwell, 43-70. Ellingsen, W., & Leknes, E. (2012). The City Region as Concept, Object, and Practice. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 66(4), 227-236. Entrikin, JN. (1991). The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity. Macmillan. Etherington, D. & Jones, M. (2009). City-Regions: New Geographies of Uneven Development and Inequality. Regional Studies, 43(2), 247-265. Friedmann, J. (1964). Regional Development in Post-Industrial Society. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 30(2), 84-90. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital. Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3-17. Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Franz Steiner Verlag. Harvey, D. (2006). The Limits to Capital. Verso. Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press. Healey, P. (2009). City Regions and Place Development. Regional Studies, 43(6), 831-843. Hettne, B. (2005). Beyond the ‘new’ regionalism. New Political Economy, 10(4), 543-571. Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (1998). The new regionalism approach. Politeia, 17(3), 6-21. Jonas, AEG. (2013). City-Regionalism as a Contingent ‘Geopolitics of Capitalism’. Geopolitics, 18(2), 284-298. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space, Blackwell. Lefebvre, H. (2000). Writings on Cities. Blackwell. Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution. University of Minnesota Press. McCann, EJ. (2002). The Urban as an Object of Study in Global Cities Literatures: Representational Practices and Conceptions of Place and Scale. In Herod A. & Wright M. W. (Eds.) Geographies of Power: Placing the Scale. Blackwell, 61-84. Parr, J. (2005). Perspectives on the City‐Region. Regional Studies, 39(5), 555-566. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2006). The Rise of the “City-region” Concept and its Development Policy Implications. European Planning Studies, 16(8), 1025-1046. Scott, A. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities, Oxford University Press. Scott, A. (2012). A World in Emergence: Cities and Regions in the 21st Century. Edward Elgar. Skeat, W. (2005). An Etymological Dictionary of English Language. Dover. Smith, N. (2008). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (3rd Ed.). The University of Georgia Press. Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interactions, and Politics Shape Development. Princeton University Press.

  • Receive Date 23 November 2022
  • Publish Date 22 June 2019