Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Assessment of the effect hydro-physical characteristics of ephemeral streams on the estimation of flood discharges (Case study: Ghollezoo watershed in Kalat Nader city)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Pasture and watershed, Faculty Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Pasture and watershed, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Department of Sociology, Faculty of Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Aim: This research aims to evaluate the effects of some hydro-physical properties of the ephemeral streams on flood flow estimation. Flood is a phenomenon that damages resources and has always been important to hydrology experts. 
Material & Method: For estimating flood discharge with specific return periods, geometric features of catchment based on rainfall-runoff models are widely applied, which has also been exerted in the present research. In this study, some catchment independent variables related to physiographic features, including drainage area, slope, length of streams, compactness factor, Gravylyus factor, elongation factor, form factor, and land uses, were calculated and extracted at 21 sub-basins. Then, the discharge and specific discharge values with return periods 2, 5, 10, and 25 years were calculated. Also, D50 and D90 were obtained using a sieve gradation (granulometry) graph of geological formations. Then, their relationship with the independent variables of the catchment was assessed by applying multivariate regressions. Then the suitable models were obtained for each discharge return period using SPSS software.
Finding: The results showed the variables' variability and importance in determining discharge with different return periods and the necessity of using an appropriate model for estimating runoff resulting from the study basins. 
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, it can be said that it is possible to prepare simple and variable models for the estimation of floods with different return periods using simple physiographic parameters. Of course, due to the diversity of climate, Geology, etc., this research's results will differ from the findings in other areas; therefore, it is necessary to perform the same investigations in areas with different characteristics to increase confidence and generalization.
Innovation: The most important innovation of this research is the presentation of new models that have not been evaluated and presented in our country so far and can be used to estimate flow and sediment discharge in watersheds with no hydrometric data.
Keywords

  1. Andres, A. S., Main, C. R., Pettay, D. T., & Ullman, W. J. (2019). Hydrophysical and hydrochemical controls of cyanobacterial blooms in Coursey Pond, Delaware (USA). Journal of environmental quality48(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.03.0108

    Eagelson, p. 1970. Dinamic hydrology. Mcgraw Hill New York. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL4910849M/Dynamic_hydrology

    Hajibigloo, M., Dastorani, M., Ghezelsofloo, A. A., & Ekhtesasi, M. R. (2013). Relation between Dominant Watershed Processes and River Morphological Changes) Case Study: Firoze-shahjoob River. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment66(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2013.35327. [In Persian]

    Kamel, K., Mahmoud, T., Le Bissonnais, Y., & Mahmoud, T. (2014). Assessment of the artificial neural networks to geomorphic modelling of sediment yield for ungauged catchments, Algeria. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering8(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2014.v8n2.175-185

    Korzhov, Y. I. (2019). Ecohydrological investigation of plain river section in the area of small hydroelectric power station influence. https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-156-8/135-154

    Lane, E. W. (1955). Design of stable channels. Transactions of the American society of Civil Engineers120(1), 1234-1260. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/TACEAT.0007188

    Leopold, L. B., & Maddock, T. (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications (Vol. 252). US Government Printing Office. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp252

    1. Lajavardi, M., Khaledi, M and Sattari, Sh., 2013, Zoning the Flood Bearing Mordaghchai Watershed (Eastern Azerbaijan), Journal of Geography and Planning, 17 (44): 237-255. https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_27.html?lang=en. [In Persian]

    Mahdavi, M., 2009, Applied Hyudrology, Tehran University press. [In Persian]

    Makkaveev, P. N., Gordeev, V. V., Zavialov, P. O., & Kurbaniyazov, A. K. (2018). Hydrochemical and Hydrological Conditions in the Ural River Lower Reaches and in the Caspian Sea Mouth Region at the Beginning of the Spring Flood. Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 43(10), 706-712.‏ https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373918100102

    Maleki, A., Hasadi, H., & Pirouzi Najad, N. (2014). Estimation of amount of Peak Discharge and the Introduction of Flooding Model in Razavar Watershed. Geography and Planning17(46), 223-239. https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_810_0.html?lang=en. [In Persian]

    Moraru, S. S., Ene, A., & Badila, A. (2020). Physical and hydro-physical characteristics of soil in the context of climate change. A case study in Danube river basin, SE Romania. Sustainability12(21), 9174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219174

    Nikonorov, A., Terleev, V., Pavlov, S., Togo, I., Volkova, Y., Makarova, T., ... & Mirschel, W. (2016). Applying the model of soil hydrophysical properties for arrangements of temporary enclosing structures. Procedia Engineering165, 1741-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.917

    Rodríguez-Blanco, M. L., M. M. Taboada-Castro, and M. T. Taboada-Castro. (2010). Factors controlling hydro-sedimentary response during runoff events in a rural catchment in the humid Spanish zone." Catena 82(3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.06.007

    Schumm, S. A. (1971). Fluvial Geomorphology P. (4), 1-30. In H. W. Shen (Ed) River Mechanics, Vol. L,Colorado State University Fort. Collins.

    Singh, K. P and Broeren, S. M. (1989). hidraulic geometry of streams and stream habit assessment. Journal of water resourse planing and management. 115(5), 583-579. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1989)115:5(583)

    Tooth, S. (2000). Process, form and change in dryland rivers: a review of recent research. Earth-Science Reviews51(1-4), 67-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00014-3

    Tran, L. T., O’Neill, R. V., Bruins, R. J., Smith, E. R., & Harden, C. (2015). Linking land use/land cover with climatic and geomorphologic factors in regional mean annual streamflow models with geospatial regression approach. Progress in Physical Geography39(2), 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314562441

    Walling, D. E., Collins, A. L., Jones, P. A., Leeks, G. J. L., & Old, G. (2006). Establishing fine-grained sediment budgets for the Pang and Lambourn LOCAR catchments, UK. Journal of hydrology330(1-2), 126-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.015

    Walling, D. E., Owens, P. N., Waterfall, B. D., Leeks, G. J., & Wass, P. D. (2000). The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment in the Humber and Tweed catchments, UK. Science of the Total Environment251, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00384-3

Volume 14, Issue 51
Spring 2023
Pages 59-42

  • Receive Date 14 July 2022
  • Revise Date 05 March 2023
  • Accept Date 25 April 2023
  • Publish Date 21 April 2023