Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Evaluating the vitality of urban spaces and their impact on social life in border cities (case study: Piranshahr)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Aim: The current research aims to assess the vitality of urban spaces and their impact on social life in Piranshahr.
Materials & Method: The research method in the present study is quantitative and explanatory in terms of purpose and in terms of application; the results are of the type of applied research; in order to analyze the data, a partial least squares model was used in Smart-pls software and t, and Pearson tests were used in SPSS software. The statistical population of the research also includes the citizens of Piranshahr; the sample size of 384 people was determined using Cochran's method.
Finding: The research findings indicate that among the indicators of vitality, three perceptual-aesthetic, identity-meaning, and physical indicators have a statistical value higher than 2.58, and their significance is notable at a 99% confidence level. Additionally, two safety, sanitary, and performance indicators have a lower statistic of 1.96, and their situation is unfavorable in Piranshahr. Additionally, among the indicators of social life in urban spaces, two indicators of social interaction and social belonging are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, and the social responsiveness index is in an unfavorable situation.
Conclusion: The results indicate a significant relationship between the components of vitality and social life in urban spaces at the 95% confidence level, suggesting that an increase in vitality has led to an improvement in social life.
Innovation: Urban vitality plays a crucial role in enhancing city livability and shaping social life. This issue is particularly vital in border areas like Piranshahr, which face various social, economic, and physical challenges. The study’s innovation lies in emphasizing vitality as a driver of improved social life in border towns, providing insights for effective future planning in Piranshahr.
Keywords

Subjects


Extended Abstract

1. Introduction  

Any adequate explanation in urban planning depends on paying attention to the three issues of space, time, and social mechanisms. This importance has become the subject of numerous and diverse theorizing, which has reflected both positive and negative results in different cities. In this regard, the proportionality of space, the meaning of "identity" space, the degree of social accessibility, and the vitality of space in terms of the quantity and quality of social interactions, as well as the components of social capital (trust, solidarity, and social participation), are of considerable importance. With this in mind, one of the key characteristics of a good city, in addition to offering economic opportunities, attractive architecture, and suitable cultural features, is a vibrant social life, which is reflected in the context of urban spaces. Therefore, it is essential to lay the groundwork for city development by examining the vitality of urban spaces and explaining their role in social life. This issue, particularly in border areas that present various complexities, demands greater attention to prevent population displacement to urban centers while fostering vibrant urban spaces. In this regard, considering the importance of border areas and the vitality of their urban spaces, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the vitality of urban spaces and their impact on social life in the border city of Piranshahr.

2. Materials and Methods

The research method employed in the present study is quantitative and explanatory, both in terms of its purpose and the application of the results, making it an applied research type. The statistical population of the study also includes the citizens of Piranshahr. The statistical population of the research also includes the citizens of Piranshahr. To determine the sample size, the Cochran method was used, and the sample size was determined to be 384 people. The method of determining the sample size is based on the simple random sampling method. Also, in order to analyze the information, structural equation modeling in Smart-pls software (the current status of the vitality of urban spaces in Piranshahr) and T-test (study of the social life of urban spaces in Piranshahr) and Pearson (study of the relationship between vitality and social life of urban spaces in Piranshahr) in SPSS software.

3. Results and Discussion

Based on the results obtained, the highest realizability among the vitality indicators of Piranshahr urban spaces was related to the perceptual-aesthetic, identity-meaning, physical, safety-health, and performance indicators, respectively, with coefficients extracted from the structural model for each being 0.724, 0.658, 0.612, 0.584, and 0.516. Among the sub-indicators, the most achievable are the components of cleanliness and tidiness, the use of green-blue elements, easy access to various spaces, the desirability of urban spaces from the local architectural perspective, and the desirability of pedestrian walkways. The statistical value in the research model for the variables indicates that the three indicators of perceptual-aesthetic, identity-meaning, and physicality have a statistical value higher than 2.58, and their realizability is significant at a 99% confidence level. Also, the two health-safety and performance indicators have a statistic lower than 1.96, and their situation is undesirable in Piranshahr. On the other hand, the results show that among the indicators of social life in urban spaces, two indicators of social interactions and social belonging are in a favorable state at a 95% confidence level. Also, the social responsiveness index is in an unfavorable state. Among the sub-indicators, out of the 10 components studied, only two components, namely the richness of activities and responsiveness to time-spatial needs and the provision of opportunities for education, learning, and guidance, had unfavorable conditions.

4. Conclusions

Studies in Piranshahr city show that from the perspective of perceptual-aesthetic indicators such as the use of green-blue elements, beauty (visual and eye-catching quality) and diversity of species (trees and shrubs) of vegetation, physical indicators such as easy access to different spaces, appropriate lighting of different spaces at night and the absence of blind spaces and the desirability of passages for walking, and identity-meaning indicators such as the use of signs and legibility of city spaces, the identity and memorability of spaces and the desirability of urban spaces from the perspective of vernacular architecture, the vitality of the city is in a favorable state. However, in terms of safety-health indicators such as psychological peace and a sense of security in space, necessary safety warnings and appropriate monitoring in different spaces, and performance indicators of responding to time and space needs and emphasizing nightlife, the city's vitality has been unsatisfactory. Also, the study of social life in Piranshahr urban spaces shows that from the perspective of social interactions such as promoting personal and social connections, social activities, social empowerment, forming participation and social trust between citizens, and eliminating the contexts and feelings of loss of people, as well as the formation of social belonging such as creating memories and creating valuable and memorable experiences and strengthening the sense of identity and belonging to the place, the city's conditions are favorable, and from the perspective of the social responsiveness index, i.e., the richness of activities and responding to time-space needs and providing the possibility of education, learning, and guidance, the city's conditions are evaluated as unfavorable. The results also indicate a significant relationship between the components of vitality and social life in urban spaces at a 95% confidence level, suggesting that increasing vitality has led to an improvement in social life.

5. Acknowledgment & Funding

The authors are thankful to all interview participants for supporting this research. Also, the manuscript did not receive a grant from any organization.

6. Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Adey, P. (2003). Secured and Sorted Motilities: Examples from the Airport. Surveillance and Society, 1(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i4.3333
Ameri Siahoyi, H.R., & Moradi, S. (2021). Investigating factors affecting the creation of liveliness in urban spaces (case example: Taqe bostan Boulevard, Kermanshah). Iran's urban development, 4(7), 250-238. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/465401/. [In Persian]
Amiri, M., & Shams, M. (2024). Investigating and Analyzing the Components Shaping Urban Vitality (A Case of Bu Ali Sidewalks, Hamedan). Environmental based Territorial Planning, 17(65), 165-184. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ebtp/Article/988218. [In Persian]
Andalib, A.R. (2009). The basic theory and principles of the border areas of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran, Faculty of Command and Headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. [In Persian]
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Towered a Critique of The Govern mentality of Unease. Alternatives, 27(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105
Cao, J., & Kang, J. (2019). Social relationships and patterns of use in urban public spaces in China and the United Kingdom. Cities, 93, 188-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.003
Carmona, M. (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 24, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41289-018-0070-3
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public Spaces Urban Spaces: The dimension of urban design. 1st edn. London, Architectural Press.
Collins, D., & Stadler, S. L. (2020). Public Spaces, Urban. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (Second Edition), 2020, 103-111.
De Magalhaes, C., & Trigo, S. F. (2017). ‘Clubification’ of urban public spaces? The withdrawal or the re-definition of the role of local government in the management of public spaces. Journal of Urban Design, 22(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336059
Dias, J., Eduardo, S., Sandro, B., Augusto, A., & Jean, L. (2017). Assessment of the sustainability of countries at worldwide. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 7, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v7n4p51
Estevez, E., Lopes, N., & Janowski, T. (2016). Smart Sustainable Cities: Reconnaissance Study. United Nations University Operating Unit on Policy-Driven Electronic Governance.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gong, W., Rui, J., & Li, T. (2024). Deciphering urban bike-sharing patterns: An in-depth analysis of natural environment and visual quality in New York's Citi bike system. Journal of Transport Geography, 115, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103799
Habibi, S.M. (1999). Civil society and urban life. Honarhaye Ziba, 2(7), 21-31. https://www.sid.ir/paper/5789/fa [In Persian]
Hedayatnezhad, S.M., Hadiani, Z., Hajinezhad, A., & Asgari, A. (2019). Interdisciplinary conceptual urban vitality (study of principles, dimensions and indicators). Studies of urban structure and function, 6(20), 75-107. https://doi.org/10.22080/shahr.2019.15754.1723 [In Persian]
Isa, A. S., Dodo, Y. A., Ojobo, H., & Alkali, I. A. (2016). Deployment of smart technologies for improving energy efficiency in office buildings in Nigeria. Life, 3(1), 3808-3811. http://www.jmest.org
Jalaladdini, S., & Oktay, D. (2012). Urban Public Spaces and Vitality: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in the Streets of Cypriot Towns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.135
Janicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernisation: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
Keith, M., O’Clery, N., Parnell, S., & Revi, A. (2020). The future of the future city? The new urban sciences and a PEAK Urban interdisciplinary disposition. Cities, 105, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102820
Kutty, A.A., Kucukvar, M., Onat, N.C., Ayvaz, B., & Abdella, G.M. (2023). Measuring sustainability, resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel fuzzy expert-based multi-criteria decision support model. Cities, 137, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104293
Kutty, A.A., Wakjira, T.G., Kucukvar, M., Abdella, G.M., & Onat, N.C. (2022). Urban resilience and livability performance of European smart cities: A novel machine learning approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
Landry, C. (2000).Urban Vitality: A New Source of Urban Competitiveness. Prince ClausFund Journal, ARCHIS issue 'Urban Vitality / Urban Heroes'.
Lara-Hernandez, J., Melis, A., & Lehmann, S. (2019). Temporary Appropriation of Public Space as an Emergence Assemblage for the Future Urban Landscape: The Case of Mexico City. Future cities and Environment, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.53
Latham, A., & Layton, J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, 13(7), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444
Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., & Davern, M. (2013). Liveable, healthy, sustainable: What are the key indicators for Melbourne Neighborhoods? Research Paper. Map.tehran.ir.
Mallick, S.K. (2021). Prediction-Adaptation-Resilience (PAR) approach- A new pathway towards future resilience and sustainable development of urban landscape. Geography and Sustainability, 2, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.06.002
Mihaila, M. (2012). About urban insertions and space discontinuities. In P. De Joanna, D. Francese & P. Passaro (Eds.), Sustainable Mediterranean Construction. Sustainable Environment in the Mediterranean Region: from Housing to Urban and Land Scale Constru ction.  Richerche di technologia dell’architettura. (pp. 371–376). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Miller, E.J. (2016). Integrated Urban Modelling for Smart City Design. In: Proceedings of the RISUD Annual International Symposium 2016- Smart Cities (RAIS 2016). Hong Kong, China.
Orenstein, D.E., & Shach-Pinsley, D. (2017). A Comparative Framework for Assessing Sustainability Initiatives at the Regional Scale. World Development, 98, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.030
Pakzad, J. (2016). Theoretical foundations and process of urban design. Tehran, Shahidi Publications. [In Persian]
Peach, J. T., & Adkisson, R. V. (2000). NAFTA and Economic Activate along the U.S Mexico Border. Journal of Economic, 2, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2000.11506287
 Praliya, S., & Garg, P. (2019). Public space quality evaluation: prerequisite for public space management. The Journal of Public Space, 4(1), 93-126. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v4i1.667
Qin, X., Zhen, F., Xiong, L. F., & Zhu, S.J. (2013). Discussion of the research methods of urban temporal and spatial behavior on big data era. Progress in Geography, 32(9), 1352–1361 (In Chinese).
Scheiber, S. (2020). A Mixed Method Approach to develop proposals for Malta's Urban Open Spaces to act as Green Infrastructure. In: K. Hannes, R. Falzon, A. Benozzo, M. Gemignani, P. Issari, C. Taylor, & J. Wyatt (Ed.), Qualitative Inquiry towards Sustainability. European Congress of Qualitative Inquiry Proceedings. Malta. Retrieved June 19, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339999244_Qualitative_Inquiry_towards_Sustainability_European_Congress_of_Qualitative_Inquiry_ Proceedings_2020#fullTextFileContent.
Shi, Y., Zheng, J., & Pei, X. (2023). Measurement Method and Influencing Mechanism of Urban Subdistrict Vitality in Shanghai Based on Multisource Data. Remote Sensing, 15(4), 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15040932
Siagian, M. (2016). Social Space as People-Gathering Tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.242
Soleymani Lamyani, M., Lotfi, S., Nikpour, A., & Abbasi, H. (2024). Spatial analysis of urban livability at the neighborhood level of Tehran city. Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 11(2), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.22034/grd.2024.21104.1604 [In Persian]
Stachura, P., & Kuligowska, K. (2021). Multi-criteria analysis of urban policy for sustainable development decision-making: A case study for Warsaw city, Poland. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.027
Toth, A., & Damyanovic, D. (2019). Planning and Implementation of Green Infrastructure in Austrian Cities. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.
Vogel, M. (2004). The Role of Frontiers and Border Zones in Interpolate Relations. Paper Presented at the Abbual Meeting for The Society for American Archarobyy, Montreal.
Worpole, K. & Knox, K. (2007) The Social Value of Public Spaces. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Xi, G.L., Zhen, F., & Chang, E.Y. (2016). Measuring urban space of flows in informationera: Empirical evidence from Nanjing, China. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 4(4), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.4.4_42
Zhen, F., Wang, B., & Wei, Z. (2015). The rise of the internet city in China: Production and consumption of internet information. Urban Studies, 52(13), 2313–2329. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26146142

  • Receive Date 27 October 2024
  • Revise Date 21 January 2025
  • Accept Date 25 January 2025
  • Publish Date 01 November 2025