Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies

Assessment of Sustainable Geotourism Development Potential and Geosite Degradation Risks in Arid Regions of Iran (Case Study: Tabas County)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to assess the geotourism potential of Tabas County and analyze the region’s natural and geological tourism capacities using the Brilha and GAM models. Additionally, the research focuses on evaluating the degradation risk of geosites and proposing strategies for the sustainable development of tourism in the area.
Materials & Methods: The data were collected through field surveys, document analysis, and library research. To analyze the geosites in the region, the Brilha and GAM models were employed. In the Brilha model, geosites were assessed based on four main criteria as scientific value, educational potential, touristic potential, and degradation risk.
Finding: Geosites such as the Nayband Fault (209), Halvan Desert (194), and Shotoran Mountains (179) possess the highest scientific and touristic capacities and could become major geotourism destinations. In terms of touristic-educational potential, the Kal Sardar (375), Morteza Ali Hot Spring (352), and Naybandan Wildlife Refuge (348) geosites received the highest scores. Furthermore, the Halvan Desert (315), Pir Hajat Doline (280), and Kal Jenni (295) geosites were found to be at the most significant risk of degradation due to human activities and resource extraction.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that Tabas County, with its unique geosites, holds significant potential for the development of scientific, natural, and cultural tourism. To ensure the sustainable utilization of these capacities, the implementation of proper management policies and protective measures is essential. Moreover, focusing on scientific and educational assessments can play a key role in both conserving these geotourism attractions and promoting them to nature-oriented tourists.
Innovation: The integration of quantitative geosite assessment with degradation risk analysis in a global geopark located in an arid region. By emphasizing the conservation challenges of vulnerable geosites, the study offers a framework for prioritizing management and protection interventions.  
Keywords

Subjects


Extended Abstract

1. Introduction

The tourism industry, especially in areas with unique geological and natural features, is recognized as an important economic sector in many countries. One of the distinct branches of this industry is geotourism, which focuses on attracting tourists to areas with notable geological phenomena. Geotourism is a compound term derived from "Geo," meaning Earth, and "tourism," referring to travel for pleasure or education. It represents a branch of tourism that is based on geological features, geomorphology, and natural landscapes. In other words, geotourism encompasses all aspects of tourism centered around geographical landscapes, geomorphic forms and processes, and geological phenomena. Beyond simply visiting these attractions, it also incorporates elements of education, conservation, and public awareness. The goal of geotourism is not only to promote scientific and sustainable tourism but also to strengthen the human connection with the Earth and enhance public understanding of natural processes. Geotourism not only emphasizes educational and scientific aspects but also plays a significant role in cultural and economic development, fostering sustainable growth in different regions. Tabas County, located in South Khorasan Province, Iran, is recognized as one of the regions with remarkable geomorphological diversity and unique geological phenomena such as active faults, karst formations, deserts, and volcanic structures. Given its unique natural features, including active geological processes, Tabas is an ideal location for developing geotourism in Iran. This research aims to assess the geotourism potential of Tabas County and analyze the scientific, educational, and touristic capacities of this region using two well-established quantitative models.

2. Materials and Methods

This research was conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach. Initially, various geosites in Tabas County were identified and listed. To assess these geosites, two quantitative models, Brehila and GAM, were applied. The Brehila model specifically evaluates geosites based on four primary criteria: scientific value, educational potential, touristic potential, and risk of degradation. This model helps prioritize geosites based on their strengths and weaknesses and is useful for determining which sites should be targeted for tourism development. The GAM model, on the other hand, evaluates the primary and complementary values of geosites, including scientific, educational, and touristic aspects. Data collection was performed through field studies, interviews with experts, and the use of GIS software like ArcGIS and Excel for data analysis.

3. Results and discussion

The results of this study showed that geosites such as the Nayband Fault, Shotori Mountains, and Halvan Desert have the highest scientific and touristic potential. Specifically, the Nayband Fault, being one of the oldest and most active faults in Iran, offers unique opportunities for geological research. The Shotori Mountains, with their distinctive tectonic and natural features, also have significant appeal for both tourists and geological researchers. In the educational-touristic evaluation, geosites such as Kal Sadr Gorge, Morteza Ali Hot Springs, and Nayband Wildlife Refuge scored the highest. These geosites were ranked high due to their accessibility, existing infrastructure, and educational value for tourists. Additionally, in terms of risk of degradation, sites like Halvan Desert, Pir Hajjat Dolines, and Kal Jeni are at high risk due to human activities such as resource extraction and climate change. The comparison of results from the Brehila and GAM models showed differences in the prioritization of geosites. In the Brehila model, Kal Sadr, Nayband Fault, and Pir Hajjat Dolines scored the highest in terms of scientific and touristic value. In contrast, the GAM model prioritized Nayband Fault, Porvarde Desert, and Pir Hajjat Dolines for tourism development. These differences highlight the importance of using multiple models to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of geosite values.

4. Conclusion

This research indicates that Tabas County, with its high geotourism potential, can serve as an important destination for both scientific and educational tourism. The region's diverse geosites and natural features, such as active faults, deserts, volcanic structures, and karst formations, provide valuable opportunities for researchers, tourists, and nature enthusiasts. However, for the sustainable utilization of these resources, effective management policies and protective measures are essential to prevent the degradation of geosites. Attention should be paid to the preservation of these geosites, and protective actions must be taken to mitigate the negative impacts of human activities and climate change. By implementing effective management strategies, it is possible to ensure that these valuable natural resources remain accessible for future generations while promoting sustainable tourism.

5. Acknowledgement & Funding

This article is derived from the Master's thesis of Ms. Fahimeh Asadollahi and was carried out with the support of Hakim Sabzevari University.

6. Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Abedini, M., Aghazadeh, N., & Sadeghi, A. (2020). Assessment of geotourism potential in Shoursoo area, Malekan County. Tourism Space, 37, 25–38. https://journals.iau.ir/article_680509.html [In Persian]
Ajaeebi, K. S. (2022). The key role of education in various fields of geoparks. National Conference on Ecotourism, Geotourism, and Natural Heritage Conservation. [In Persian]
Alizadeh, A. (2015). Principles of Applied Hydrology (4th ed.). Imam Reza University Press. [In Persian]
Akbarian, M. (2021). Evaluation of environmental impacts of geotourism development in Hormuz Island. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 37, 20–39.  https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2021.266888.1248 [In Persian]
Anokhin, A. Y., Kropinova, E. G., Spiriajevas, E. (2021). Developing geotourism with a focus on geoheritage in a transboundary region: the case of the Curonian Spit, a UNESCO site, Baltic Region, 13(2):112-128. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-6
Arifin, H. S., Prastowo, F. A. A., Widyowati, W., Octavianti, M. (2023). Community Perception of Geotourism Development in Ciletuh Palabuhanratu UNESCO Global Geopark. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 16(3), 2139-2152. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2023-00000161.
Beheshti, A., AmirAhmadi, A., Goli Mokhtari, L., & Baghaei Nejad, N. (2026). Evaluation and Assessment of Geomythosites in Sabzevar County as Tourist Attractions. Geographical Engineering of Territory, 1(10). https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2025.498811.1603 [In Persian]
Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage, 8(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
Carrión-Mero, P., Borja-Bernal, C., Herrera-Franco, G., Morante-Carballo, F., Jaya-Montalvo, M., Maldonado-Zamora, A, Berrezueta, E. (2021). Geosites and Geotourism in the Local Development of Communities of the Andes Mountains. A Case Study. Sustainability, 13(9), 4624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094624
Citiroglu, H. K., Arca, D. (2023). Assessing Caves for Geotourism Development—An Example from Türkiye Using a Geographical Information Systems (GIS) Based Multi-Criteria Approach. Geotourism in the Middle East, 15(7), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24170-3_14
Divandari, J., & Il Beigi Pour, F. (2019). Evaluation of challenges in attracting event-based tourism using SWOT model; Case study: Saif Abad Village, Kouhrang County. Tourism Research and Sustainable Development, 2(6), 31–41. http://www.trsd.ir/post.aspx?id=601 [In Persian]
Goli Mokhtari, L., & Fereshteh Biramali. (2018). Analysis of Geodiversity (Case study: Eshtehard County, Iran). Natural Geography Research, 50(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2018.226075.1006996 [In Persian]
Heidari Sarban, V. (2012). Analysis of barriers affecting the development of rural tourism in Sardabeh Village, Ardabil County. Geography and Environmental Studies, 1, 83–97. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1623666880-10398-99-6.pdf [In Persian]
https://tabasgeopark.com/pirhajat-doline
Jahangir, M. H., & Mohammadi, A. (2017). Evaluate the Geo-tourism Development Might of Karaftou cave in Kurdistan using SWOT strategic model and analytical model FASSOULAS. Geography (Regional Planning), 7, 167–182. https://www.jgeoqeshm.ir/article_54114.html?lang=en [In Persian]
Kamran, H., Alizadeh, M., & Nikbakht, R. (2020). Evaluation of selected geosites in Isfahan Province using Brilha model. Geography (Journal of the Iranian Geographical Association), 18, 5–22. 20.1001.1.27172996.1399.18.1.1.6 [In Persian]
Kaur, G., (2022). Geodiversity, Geoheritage and Geoconservation: A Global Perspective. Jour. Geol. Soc. India. . 98 (9): 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-022-2156-1.
Khodabakhshi, Z., Faridpour, M., & Garavand, L. (2016). Evaluation of Ilam Province geomorphosites for achieving sustainable development using the Pereira model. 2nd International Congress on Earth Sciences and Urban Development, Tabriz. [In Persian]
Kubalíková, L. (2019). Assessing Geotourism Resources on a Local Level: A Case Study from Southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Resources, 8(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8030150
Li, Q. J., Ng, Y., Wu, R. R. (2022). Strategies and problems in geotourism interpretation: A comprehensive literature review of an interdisciplinary chinese to english translation. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.02.001
Marjanović, M., R, A., Radivojević, Antić, A., Peppoloni, S., Capua, G. D., . . . Markov. (2022). Geotourism and geoethics as support for rural development in the Knjaževac municipality, Serbia. Open Geosciences, 14(1), 812. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0388
Mastika, I. K., Harsono, S. S., Khristianto, W., Oktawirani, P., Hutama, P. S. (2023). Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.002
Mahdavi, M., & Taherkhani, M. (2012). Application of Statistics in Geography (4th ed.), 1–370. [In Persian]
Mazidi, A., Enayatpour, M., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Determining the climate of Kerman Province using Ambrothermic curve, De Martonne aridity index, and Emberger climate diagram. Geography and Human Relations, 4(2), 35-43. https://doi.org/ 10.22034/gahr.2021.287987.1565 [In Persian]
Mohtashami, F., & Sedaghat, M. (2021). The role of cave tourism in Zagros Mountains in promoting sustainable geotourism (Case study: Comparing Alisadr Cave in Hamedan and Ghoori Ghaleh Cave in Kermanshah). Tourism Research and Sustainable Development, 13, 23–36. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1625892593-10159-13-3.pdf [In Persian]
Mokhtari, L., Bahramabadi, E., & Solgi, L. (2018). Comparative study of the geotourism abilities of Aleshtar city using Pralong and Perira models. Geography and Development16(52), 69-96 16(52), 69-96. https://doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4110 [In Persian]
Moradnrjad, J., & Bagheri, V. (2019). Investigating the Capabilities of Geo Tourism Triangle in Dehloran County in Ilam Province. Application of Geography information system and remote sensing in planning, 9(4), 55-69. https://journals.iau.ir/article_665870_3d705900ddccd86dfc3668c0a44f9336.pdf [In Persian]
Ólafsdóttir, R., Tverijonaite, E. (2018). Geotourism: A Systematic Literature Review. Geosciences, 8(7), 234. ‏‏  https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8070234
Omidvar, S., Sarfi, M., & Taghipour, A. A. (2023). Evaluating the geotourism potential of northern Damghan using the Brilha model. Geography and Regional Development, 21(3), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2023.81781.1265 [In Persian]
Orouji, H. (2012). Optimal geomorphosite location for tourism using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and their evaluation through the geomorphotourism model (Case study: Tabas County), M.Sc. Thesis in Geography and Tourism Planning, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Pál, M., Albert, G. (2023). From geodiversity assessment to geosite analysis – a GIS-aided workflow from the Bakony–Balaton UNESCO Global Geopark, Hungary. Geological Society, London, 530.
Raeisi, R., Khosravi, M., & Al-Modarresi, S. (2020). Geotourism assessment in Shahdad region using Reynard method. 4th National Conference on Advanced Spatial Analysis Models, Yazd. [In Persian]
Rahimi Herabadi, S., Saffari, A., & Ghanavati, A. A. (2020). A managerial model for geotourism with emphasis on desert geomorphosites of Iran; Case study: Tabas County. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 9, 108–131. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2020.122219 [In Persian]
Rajabi, M., Rahnemoon, H., & Abazari, K. (2017). Strategies and policies for geotourism development in Meshgin Shahr County. Tourism Space, 33, 1–16. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/518451/ [In Persian]
Safavi, S. R., Orouji, H., Alizadeh, M., & Zamaniyan, A. (2019). Assessing the impacts and relationships between geotourism and rural development; Case study: Villages surrounding Kal Sardareh in Tabas County. Spatial Geography Planning, 34, 173–194. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2020.102609   [In Persian]
Shafiei, Z., Farsani, N. T., & Abdollahpour, M. (2017). The benefit of geo-branding in a rural geotourism destination: Isfahan, Iran. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 19(1), 96-103. http://gtg.webhost.uoradea.ro/PDF/GTG-1-2017/211_Farsani.pdf
Sheibani, V. Y. (2019). Assessment of mineral geosites in Tabas County as a mining-oriented geopark in Central East Iran. Regional Geography and Development, 33, 191–215.  https://doi.org/10.22067/geography.v17i2.76465 [In Persian]
Sumarto, R. H., Sumartono, S., Muluk, M. R. K., Nuh, M. (2020). Penta-Helix and Quintuple-Helix in the Management of Tourism Villages in Yogyakarta City. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance, 14(1), 46_57. . https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.5
Vujicic, M & Vasiljevic, D & Markovic, S & Hose, T & Lukic, T & Hadzic, O & Janievic, S (2011). Preliminary Geosites Assessment Model (GAM) and Its Application on Fruska Gora Mountain, Potential Geotourism Detinarion of Serbia; Acta Geographica Slovenica, V 51.2, 361–377. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51303
Xu, K., Wu, W. (2022). Geoparks and Geotourism in China: A Sustainable Approach to Geoheritage Conservation and Local Development—A Review. Land, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091493
Yu, A. A., & Eduardas, S. (2021). Developing geotourism with a focus on geoheritage in a transboundary region: the case of the Curonian Spit, a UNESCO site. Baltic Region, 13(S2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-6
Zafeiropoulos, G., Drinia, H., Antonarakou, A., Zouros, N. (2021). From Geoheritage to Geoeducation, Geoethics and Geotourism: A Critical Evaluation of the Greek Region. Geosciences, 11(9), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11090381
Zangeneh Asadi, M. A., AmirAhmadi, A., & Shayan Yeganeh, A. A. (2018). Evaluation of geomorphosites in the proposed geopark of western Khorasan Razavi using Brilha method for geological heritage conservation. Geography and Planning, 23(63), 117–137. https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7508.html [In Persian]
Zorlu, K., Dede, V., (2023). Assessment of glacial geoheritage by multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in the Yalnızçam Mountains, Northeastern Türkiye, International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.001
Volume 16, Issue 62 - Serial Number 62
(In Progress)
Winter 2026
Pages 37-58

  • Receive Date 23 February 2025
  • Revise Date 10 June 2025
  • Accept Date 11 June 2025
  • Publish Date 21 January 2026