مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک

مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک

تدوین و بررسی استراتژی‌های توسعه اکوتوریسم بیابان لوت با تکنیک سناریونویسی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مدیریت جهانگردی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
2 گروه مدیریت جهانگردی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر و گروه گردشگری، دانشکده گردشگری، مجتمع آموزش عالی بم، بم، ایران.
چکیده
هدف: گردشگری بیابان به عنوان یکی از شاخه­‌های اکوتوریسم، به‌ ویژه در مناطق خشک و نیمه‌خشک، فرصت‌های منحصربه‌فردی را برای توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی- فرهنگی و زیست‌­محیطی فراهم می‌آورد. در این بین بیابان لوت، به عنوان یکی از گرم‌ترین و خشک‌ترین مناطق جهان، دارای پتانسیل بالایی برای توسعه اکوتوریسم در ایران است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارائه تصاویر قابل درک و ملموس از آینده­‌های محتمل گردشگری بیابان لوت در قالب سناریوهای مختلف با بهره­‌گیری از تکنیک سناریونویسی است.
روش و داده: این پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی، از نظر روش، ترکیبی از روش­‌های اسنادی و پیمایشی و از نظر ماهیت بر اساس روش برنامه­‌ریزی مبتنی بر سناریو، اکتشافی و تحلیلی است. روش گردآوری داده‌­ها در این پژوهش کیفی و از طریق مصاحبه با بیست نفر از اساتید گردشگری و اکوتوریسم به عنوان جامعه آماری تحقیق از طریق تکنیک دلفی انجام شد. همچنین، از نرم‌افزارهای میک­مک و سناریو­ویزارد برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌­ها استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: 15 وضعیت محتمل برای 5 عامل کلیدی مؤثر بر توسعه گردشگری بیابان لوت تعریف گردید. برای هر عامل نیز 3 وضعیت خوش­بینانه، بینابین و بدبینانه تعریف گردید. عدم قطعیت­‌های پیشروی توسعه آینده اکوتوریسم بیابان لوت استخراج و در نهایت سناریوهای باورپذیر توسعه اکوتوریسم بیابان لوت با توجه به عدم‌­قطعیت‌های مطرح‌شده، در قالب سه سناریوی سپیده‌­ی فرکیانی، رقص سیزفوس در چرخ سمساره و شکاف نیچه­‌ای در سپهر، تدوین و تحلیل شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: جهت رسیدن به سناریوی مطلوب توسعه گردشگری بیابان لوت، لازم است که کلیه ذی‌نفعان، اعم از دولت و ارگان­‌های مختلف دولتی، جامعه محلی و سرمایه‌گذاران، در یک همکاری مؤثر و سازنده خود را نسبت به پذیرش عدم قطعیت‌های آینده بیشتر منعطف نموده و از چالش‌ها و فرصت­‌هایی که ممکن است در آینده رخ دهد، بیشترین استفاده را حاصل نمایند.
نوآوری، کاربرد نتایج: از مهم‌ترین جنبه‌‌های نوآورانه تحقیق می‌توان به استفاده از روش برنامه­‌ریزی سناریو به عنوان یک روش پیش‌­بینی بلندمدت جهت توسعه اکوتوریسم بیابان لوت اشاره کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Developing and Assessing Ecotourism Strategies in the Lut Desert through Scenario Planning

نویسندگان English

Mehdi Ramezanzade Lasboy 1
Leila Jalalabadi 2
1 Tourism Management Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Department of Tourism Management, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar and Department of Tourism, Faculty of Tourism, Bam Higher Education Complex, Bam, Iran
چکیده English

Aim: Desert tourism, as a subset of ecotourism, offers unique opportunities for economic, socio-cultural, and environmental development, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. The Lut Desert, one of the hottest and driest areas in the world, holds significant potential for ecotourism development in Iran. This study aims to present tangible, plausible future scenarios for desert tourism in the Lut Desert using scenario-writing techniques.
Material & Method: This research combines documentary and surveying methods for practical purposes, and exploratory and analytical methods for methods, and, in terms of nature, the scenario-based planning method. The data collection method in this qualitative study was interviews with 20 professors of Tourism and ecotourism, the research population, conducted using the Delphi technique. Also, Mic-Mac software and Scenario Wizard were used to analyze the data.
Finding: 15 possible situations were defined for 5 key factors influencing the development of tourism in the Lūt Desert. Three scenarios, optimistic, moderate, and pessimistic, were defined for each factor. Uncertainties affecting the future of Lut Desert ecotourism were extracted, and three plausible scenarios were developed and analyzed: dawn of the ferrician, the Sisphus dance in the wheel of the sphere, and the niche gap in the shield.
Conclusion: To achieve the desired scenario of development of desert tourism, it is necessary for all stakeholders, including the government and various government bodies, the local community, and investors, to be more flexible in effective and constructive cooperation rather than accepting future uncertainties and to make the most of the challenges and opportunities that may occur in the future.
Innovation: The most important innovative aspects of the research include the use of scenario planning as a long-term predictive method for the development of Lūt desert ecotourism.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ecotourism
Desert tourism
Scenario planning
Lut desert

Extended Abstract

1. Introduction

The development and expansion of ecotourism in desert areas with potential and capacities is very necessary for the comprehensive development of tourism in the country. Of the country's total area, 43 million hectares are among the desert ecosystems, which, despite their apparent violence, are rich in unique natural and human attractions.

Given the capabilities and limitations of Lut Desert ecotourism, this research presents scenarios for how stakeholders of desert ecotourism and tourism actively shape the future rather than react to it by formulating scenario planning as a tool for Sustainable Development and adaptive management.

The purpose of scenarios for predicting the future of Louth desert ecotourism in 1415 is to examine the behavioral dimensions and various stresses that may occur between the organizations involved, the local community, tourists, and the resources needed by each of them, and the impact of these stresses on the future of Louth desert ecotourism. In this study, each scenario involves processes that are well aligned with theoretical criteria to guide all stakeholders and activists of the Lut Desert tourism to improve the potential and measures through which they can more flexible themselves to accept future uncertainties and make the most of the challenges and opportunities that may occur in the future.

2. Materials and methods

To conduct the research, the Delphi technique, interaction/ structural effects analysis, and scenario writing were used. The Delphi technique was used to survey experts in several stages, and the method of counter-effect balance analysis for scenarios was used to estimate the scenarios of the driving and key factors. The interaction balance Analysis tool is the scenario software. Scenario writing is a very effective and useful way to plan for the medium and long term in situations of uncertainty. This method helps the system to have a proper orientation towards the course of future events, in addition to preparing numerous plans for unexpected events. Scenario software is designed to perform complex scenario-writing calculations. After selecting the key factors, each of the factors is classified into different situations, and these situations are made available to experts and experts in a matrix for all key factors. In this questionnaire, situations can also show a negative impact, and the number of questions varies from 3 to 3. The central question of the questionnaire is "If the A1 status of the key factor A occurs in the future of Lut Desert ecotourism, what impact will it have on the occurrence or absence of the B2 status of the key factor B, the answer to which is mentioned in a spectrum of numbers 3 to 3, and finally, analyzed in the software".

3. Results and Discussion

In view of the issues raised in the scenarios for the development of tourism in the Lut Desert, and in view of the uncertainties raised, three scenarios that can be illustrated were compiled as follows:

The scenario of the "Sepideh Farkiani" represents the ideal path for the development of ecotourism in the Lut Desert on the horizon 1415. This scenario, emphasizing integrated coordination and management, addresses sustainable flourishing and maintaining a balance between development and conservation of Natural Resources.

The scenario of " raqs seezfos dar charkh samsareh " emphasizes the gradual and poor development of ecotourism in the Lut Desert until 1415.

The " shekaf nicheh dar sephr " scenario clearly warns that if ecotourism monitoring and management are not seriously pursued in the Lut Desert, the Lut Desert will face serious crises by 1415.

 

4. Conclusion

These three scenarios reflect the different paths that the Louth desert can take to develop its future ecotourism by 1415. The "dawn of the Furkian" scenario, as the most ideal scenario, will bring the best result for the development of the ecotourism of the Louth desert, given its full coordination and sustainable development. The scenario of "Sisphus dancing on the wheel of the diamond" indicates a gradual and defective process in which development does not proceed with care and attention to the balance between growth and conservation of Natural Resources. The "niche gap in the shield" scenario, as a warning, represents a crisis path in which neglect of management and follow-up will lead to environmental, social, and economic crises. For the Lut Desert, it is essential to follow the path of the "dawn of the ferakiani" scenario, where sustainable development and conservation of natural, cultural, and social resources are realized alongside economic growth, empowerment of local communities, and attracting international tourists.

These scenarios have practical applications for managers, policy makers, and other stakeholders as they provide a framework for developing and evaluating robust strategies and policies and help planners and managers recognize, consider, and think about the uncertainties they are likely to face.

5. Acknowledgement & Funding

This research is supported by the research grant of the University of Mazandaran (number 33/26883). We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

6. Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

تبریزی نازنین، زاهدی کلاکی ابراهیم. (1397). ارزیابی توان اکولوژیک و شناسایی مناطق مستعد توسعه اکوتوریسم پایدار با روش‌های MCE و WLC  (مورد مطالعه: شهرستان گرگان). فضای جغرافیایی. ۱۸ (۶۳) :۲۰۷-۲۲۴.
رحیمی پور, بهاره، ظاهری، محمد و کریم زاده، حسین. (1403). تدوین سناریوهای توسعه پایدار گردشگری روستایی با رویکرد آینده‌نگاری (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای هدف گردشگری شهرستان سقز). گردشگری و توسعه, 13(1), 109-127.
علی اکبری، اسماعیل، مرصوصی، نفیسه و جلال آبادی، لیلا. (1399). تدوین سناریوهای مؤثر بر آینده گردشگری پایدار شهرکرمان با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری, 15(50), 35-60.
علیزاده، رضا، درفشی، خه­بات و مسائلی، ارشک . (1402). سناریوهای توسعه طبیعت­گردی بر پایه سند چشم­انداز توسعه کشور و با رویکرد آینده­نگری (مطالعه­ موردی: استان یزد). توسعه پایدار محیط جغرافیایی, 5(8),88-70.
فال سلیمان, محمود , میکانیکی, جواد و نیک شعار, مرجان . (1401). اکوتوریسم کویری و توسعه پایدار روستایی استان خراسان جنوبی. مطالعات مدیریت توسعه سبز, 1(1), 117-132.
کاظمی قهفرخی، سیده حمیده، نعمتی، ولی، معدنی، جواد و سیدموسوی، میرحمید . (1403). تدوین سناریوهای کاربرد فناوری‌های سبز در گردشگری کم‌کربن. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری.
مستوفی، احمد. (1351). شهداد و جغرافیای تاریخی دشت لوت، نشریه شماره ۸ ،گزارش‌های جغرافیایی.
Alrawaf, T., Abubakar, I., Alshabibi, M., Al-Matar, M., Dano, L., Elhadi, A., Farooqi, A., Alshihri, S., Alzenifeer, M., & Al-Odah, A. (2023). The distribution of ecotourism activities and potential consequences for the Saudi desert ecosystem. Arid Environments, 213, 1-11. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2023.104950.
Approach to Assess Tourism Contributions to Conservation of IUCN-Redlisted Mammal Species. PLoS ONE 7(9): e44134. ­ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044134.
Ball, P., Vince, G., Kucharski, A., Prasad, A., Rutherford, A., Climer, N., ... & Preston, L. (2017). What's Next?: Even Scientists Can’t Predict the Future–or Can They?. Profile Books.
Becker, H. S. (1983). Scenarios. A tool of growing importance to policy analysts in government and industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(83)90049-5.
Bonilla, S. H., Silva, H. R. O., Terra da Silva, M., Franco Gonçalves, R., & Sacomano, J. B. (2018). Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges. Sustainability10(10), 3740. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103740.
Bradfield, R. M. (2008). Cognitive barriers in the scenario development process. Advances in Developing Human Resources10(2), 198-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307313320.
Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & van der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.
Buckley RC, Castley JG, Pegas FdV, Mossaz AC, Steven R (2012) A population Accounting
Buckley RC, Morrison C, Castley JG (2016) Net effects of ecotourism on threatened species survival. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0147988. journal.pone.0147988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147988.
Capistrano, R. C., & Notorio, P. A. (2021). A content analysis of the future of tourism through the presidential state of the nation address in the Philippines (1987-2019). Journal of Tourism Futures, 7(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-05-2020-0075.
Carpenter, S. R., Bennett, E. M., & Peterson, G. D. (2006). Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview.­Ecology and Society,­ 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01610-110129.
Chaminuka, P., Groeneveld, R. A., Selomane, A. O., & van Ierland, E. C. (2012). Tourist preferences for ecotourism in rural communities adjacent to Kruger National Park: A choice experiment approach. Tourism Management, 33(1), 168–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.02.016.
Chogan, P. (2022). Exploring motivations and satisfaction of ecolodge patrons in desert areas of Iran. International Hospitality Review, 36(2), 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IHR-12-2020-0071.
Coria J, Calfucura E. (2012). Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Ecological Economics, 73: 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.024
Das, M. Chatterjee, B. (2015). Ecotourism: A panacea or a predicament? Tourism Management Perspectives, 14(7):3-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.01.002.
development. Forum for Development Studies, 43(3), 463–487.Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2016.1157517.
Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2007). Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment:Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(3), 206–219.
Elhattab, N. (2020). Desert tourism as a tool to achieve development requirements Sustainable development in light of Vision 2030 - a prospective study. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality, 18(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaauth.2020.31409.1020.
Fennell, D. A. (2015). Ecotourism fourth edition, 3-20. Routledge.
Gössling, S. (1999). Ecotourism: A means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions? Ecological Economics, 29(2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00012-9.
Gössling, S., & Scott, D. (2012). Scenario planning for sustainable tourism: an introduction. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(6), 773–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.699064.
Hao, H., Wang, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). Empowering Scenario Planning with Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective on Building Smart and Resilient Cities. Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.06.012.
Hunt CA, Durham WH, Driscoll L, Honey M. (2015). Can ecotourism deliver real economic, social, and environmental benefits? A study of the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(3): 339–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.965176.
Jalani, J.O., 2012. Local people’s perception on the impacts and importance of ecotourism in Sabang, Palawan, Philippines. Procedia -Soc. Behav. Sci. 57, 247–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1182.
Kok, K., Bärlund, I., Flörke, M., Holman, I., Gramberger, M., Sendzimir, J., Stuch, B., & Zellmer, K. (2015). European participatory scenario development: Strengthening the link between stories and models. Climatic Change, 128(3-4), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1143-y.
Lindsey, P. A., Alexander, R. R., du Toit, J. T., & Mills, M. G. L. (2005). The potential contribution of ecotourism to African wild dog Lycaon pictus conservation in South Africa. Biological Conservation, ­123(3), 339–348. ­doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.002.
Liu, Y. L., Chiang, J. T., & Ko, P. F. (2023). The benefits of tourism for rural community development. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01610-4.
Mossaz, A. C., Buckley, R., & Castley, J. G. (2015). Ecotourism Contributions to Conservation of African Big Cats. Journal for Nature Conservation, 28,:112–118. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.009.
Motlagh, E. Y., Hajjarian, M., Zadeh, O. H., & Alijanpour, A. (2020). The difference of expert opinion on the forest-based ecotourism development in developed countries and Iran. Land Use Policy. 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104549.
Nevin, O., & Gilbert, B. (2005). Measuring the cost of risk avoidance in brown bears: Further evidence of positive impacts of ecotourism. Biological Conservation, 123, 453–460. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.007.
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy, M., & Wright, G., & Cairns, G. (2011). Scenario thinking: Practical approaches to the future. Springer.
Page, S. J., Yeoman, I., Connell, J., & Greenwood, C. (2010). Scenario planning as a tool to understand uncertainty in tourism: The example of transport and tourism in Scotland in 2025.Current Issues in Tourism, 13(2), 99–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500802613519.
Pillkahn, U.(2008), Using trends and scenarios as tools for strategy development: shaping the future of your enterprise. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
Poudyal, N. C., Paudel, B., & Tarrant,M. A. (2013). A time series analysis of the impact of recession on national park visitation in the United States. Tourism Management, 35, 181–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.001.
Prebensen, N. K., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Why visit an eco-friendly destination? Perspectives of four Europeannationalities. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 19(2), 105–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356766712457671.
Ramirez, R., Mukherjee, M., Vezzoli, S., & Kramer, A. M. (2015). Scenarios as a scholarly methodology to produce ‘interesting research’. Futures, 71, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.006.
Ramkissoon, H. (2022a). Behavior-change in tourism. In D. Buhalis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of tourism management and marketing (pp. 271–274). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Ramkissoon, H., Mavondo, F., & Sowamber, V. (2020). Corporate social responsibility at LUX* resorts and hotels: Satisfaction and loyalty implications for employee and cus- tomer social responsibility. Sustainability, 12(22), 9745. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229745.
Reimer, J.K.K., Walter, P., 2013. How do you know it when you see it? Community-based ecotourism in the Cardamom Mountains of southwestern Cambodia. Tourism Management. 34, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.04.002.
Sahani, N. (2021). Application of hybrid SWOT-AHP-FuzzyAHP model for formulation and prioritization of ecotourism strategies in Western Himalaya, India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(3), 349–362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.08.001.
Samal, R., & Dash, M. (2023). Ecotourism, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods: Understanding the convergence and divergence. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks11(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.11.001
Sánchez-Prieto, M. C., Luna-González, A., Espinoza-Tenorio, A., & González-Ocampo, H. A. (2021). Planning Ecotourism in Coastal Protected Areas; Projecting Temporal Management Scenarios. Sustainability, 13(14), 7528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147528
Seyitoğlu, F., & Costa, C. (2022). A systematic review of scenario planning studies in tourism and hospitality research. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events16(4), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2022.2032108.
Shaukat, M. H., Shah, S., Ali, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2023). Mapping stakeholder role in building destination image and destination brand: Mediating role of stakeholder brand engagement. Tourism Analysis, 28(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354222X16618132626722.
Singleton,B.E.(2016).Framing a Supermantra: Ecotourism, engagement and conceptualisations of ‘Good’
Steven, R., Castley, J. G., & Buckley, R. (2013). Tourism Revenue as a Conservation Tool for Threatened Birds in Protected Areas. PLoS ONE, 8(5), 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062598.
Stronza, A. (2008). Through a new mirror: reflections on tourism and identity in the Amazon. Human Organization 67(3): 244–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.3.a556044720353823.
Stronza, A. L., Hunt, C. A., & Fitzgerald, L. A. (2019). Ecotourism for conservation? Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 44(1), 229–253. ­ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ101718-033046.
Suryawan, I. W. K., Gunawan, V. D., & Lee, C.-H. (2025). The role of local adaptive capacity in marine ecotourism scenarios. Tourism Management, 107, 105039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105039.
Tabrizi N, Zahedi E.(2018). Evaluation of Ecological Capability and identification of Suitable areas to Develop Sustainable Ecotourism using MCE and WLC method Case Study: Gorgan. Geographic space,18, 224-207(63). http://geographical-space.iau-ahar.ac.ir/article-1-2621-fa.html. [In Persian]
Taibah, H., Al-Hilali, A., & Huzaim, W. (2023). The significance of camping in promoting nature tourism, a field study on Riyadh tourists in line with Saudi Arabia’s vision 2030. Tourism, Hospitality and Archeology Sciences, 4, 73–90. doi.org/10.21608/kjao.2023.286091.
Wondirad, A. (2019). Does ecotourism contribute to sustainable destination development, or is it just a marketing hoax? Analyzing twenty-five years contested journey of ecotourism through a meta-analysis of tourism journal publications. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 24(11), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2019.1665557.
Wunder, S. (2000). Ecotourism and economic incentives — an empirical approach. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00119-6.
Zeppel, H. (2006). Indigenous Ecotourism: Sustainable Development and Management. CABI: Wallingford, UK.
Zhang, S. (2014). A research on thoughts about tourismscenario planning and project experience design. In 3rdInternational Conference on Science and SocialResearch, Tianjin, Chinn.
Zheng, B., Li, M., Yu, B., & Gao, L. (2021). The Future of Community-Based Ecotourism (CBET) in China’s Protected Areas: A Consistent Optimal Scenario for Multiple Stakeholders. Forests, 12(12),1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121753
دوره 17، شماره 63 - شماره پیاپی 63
در حال انتشار
بهار 1405
صفحه 168-187

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 02 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 11 اردیبهشت 1405